• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Julie C. v. Andrew C., No. 49A05-0909-CV-523, __N.E.2D__ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 30, 2010)

April 1, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Change in visitation to seven nights every two weeks was a de facto change of custody subject to the statutes on custody modification. When considering changing a decree for joint legal custody, the court must consider the joint legal custody factors in IC 31-17-2-15 in addition to the standard factors in IC 31-17-2-8.

Boone v. Boone, No. 45A03-0906-CV-243, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 31, 2010)

April 1, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, E. Najam

Divorce court could not order support retroactive to a date seventeen months prior to the filing of the dissolution action.

Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. Gibson, No. 64A04-0908-CV-445, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 25, 2010)

March 26, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau

“Discovery rule” for tolling statute of limitations does not apply when plaintiff knew of injury but did not discover identity of tortfeasor until limitations period had run.

Siwinski v. Town of Ogden Dunes, No. 64A03-0909-CV-429, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 16, 2010)

March 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Short-term rental of single family residence was not a “commercial” activity in violation of a zoning ordinance which limited “R” zones to “single-family dwelling” without expressly prohibiting short-term rentals.

A.M.B. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, No. 45A03-0910-JV-476, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 12, 2010)

March 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When final involuntary termination hearing was virtually concluded by the time mother arrived, court denied due process when it finished without allowing mother to testify.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 233
  • Go to page 234
  • Go to page 235
  • Go to page 236
  • Go to page 237
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs