• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Hematology-Oncology of Indiana v. Fruits, No. 49A05-0910-CV-556, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 18, 2010)

August 20, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Attorney fees, costs, and expenses are recoverable damages under the Wrongful Death Act and the Adult Wrongful Death Act. NOTE: This opinion conflicts with McCabe v. Commissioner, Ind. Dep’t of Ins., reported in the July 23, 2010 issue of Case Clips.

Bauer v. Shepard, No. 09-2963, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir., Aug. 20, 2010)

August 20, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: 7th Circuit, F. Easterbrook

The challenge to the 2008 version of the Code of Judicial Conduct is unripe, not moot.

Droscha v. Shepherd, No. 52A02-1001-PL-26, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 3, 2010)

August 16, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Indiana extends judicial and/or quasi-judicial immunity to arbitrators and their sponsors.

Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. McNeil, No. 02A03-1001-MI-90, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 5, 2010)

August 16, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Trial court erred when it interpreted Ind. Code § 34-11-2-4(3) to impose a statute of limitations on the BMV’s ability to impose an administrative suspension.

City of Indianapolis v. Hicks, No. 49A02-1002-CT-95, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2010)

August 16, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

(1) City waived its challenge based on the magistrate’s lack of authority to grant Plaintiff’s motion to correct error by failing to object until after time for ruling on the motion expired; (2) waiver notwithstanding, trial court properly used a nunc pro tunc order to grant Plaintiff’s motion, because the CCS provides a sufficient written memorial indicating the trial court adopted the magistrate’s recommendation within the required time.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 231
  • Page 232
  • Page 233
  • Page 234
  • Page 235
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 263
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs