• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Weigand Construction Co. v. Stephens Fabrication, Inc., No. 18A02-0910-CV-953, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 25, 2010)

June 29, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

While plaintiff’s claim survived its subsequent voluntary bankruptcy proceedings, plaintiff did not timely make its claim pursuant to the terms of the parties’ contract.

Howard v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., No. 87A01-0910-CV-512, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 17, 2010)

June 18, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Trial court erred in substituting underinsured driver for insurance company as the sole named defendant in contract case seeking recovery of underinsured motorist benefits, where the insurance company did not attempt to step into the shoes of and defend the tortfeasor or to preserve a subrogation interest.

Elliott v. Rush Memorial Hosp., No. 70A01-0911-CV-553, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 11, 2010)

June 18, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Where hospital employee forcibly catheterized plaintiff for a urine sample after an oral statement from the police that the sample was court ordered, plaintiff’s complaint adequately stated factual issues as to whether: (1) the sample was obtained pursuant to a written request, (2) the taking of the sample constituted reasonable force, and (3) forced catheterization constituted a “medically accepted manner” for obtaining a urine sample, all pursuant to Ind. Code § 9-30-6-6. Trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s medical malpractice complaint, however, because plaintiff was not a “patient” of the defendants.

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Jarrells, No. 29S02-0908-CV-378, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 27, 2010)

June 1, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

In future trials where the trier of fact finds that the evidence establishes that the plaintiff has received payment for some of the damages from collateral sources, the award should include those damages, but only to the extent that the evidence establishes an obligation to repay.

Indiana Family & Social Servs. Admin. v. Meyer, No. 69S01-0905-CV-233, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 25, 2010)

May 28, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

A trial court has no authority to grant an extension of time to file the record in a petition for review of an administrative agency action under the Indiana Administrative Orders and Procedures Act if the record is not filed within the required statutory period or any authorized extension of this period.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 227
  • Go to page 228
  • Go to page 229
  • Go to page 230
  • Go to page 231
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs