• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Holmes v. Celadon Trucking Servs. of Ind., Inc., No. 49A02-1007-PL-714, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2010)

November 22, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

An action commences when the initiating party files the original and necessary copies of the complaint, the prescribed filing fee, and the original and necessary copies of the summons. Delayed filing of an appearance has no impact on the commencement of the action for statute of limitations purposes.

Small v. Rogers, No. 29A02-1001-PL-30, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2010)

November 22, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Co-guarantor who paid some of guaranteed debt was not entitled to contribution from the other guarantor, when the debt had not been reduced to judgment and the amount paid was less than the co-guarantor’s proportionate share of the total guaranteed.

Arlton v. Schraut, No. 79A02-0906-CV-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 9, 2010)

November 12, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Deliberating jury should have been provided with a computer or some other method to view CD exhibits containing high-resolution digital images of plaintiff’s pre-surgery retina; failure of court to provide a viewing method or to give tendered instruction that jury could ask to view the CD images in open court was reversible error.

Blanford v. Blanford, No. 65A01-1004-DR-181, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 10, 2010)

November 12, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Use of separate child support worksheets, one for each child, to adjust for the different number of overnights each child would have with the noncustodial parent, erroneously inflated the parent’s support obligation under the Guidelines.

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Clancy, No. 45A03-0910-CV-498, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 26, 2010)

October 29, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Robb

Insurance company’s affirmative defense that coverage for husband’s emotional distress claim was “fairly debatable” was not an advice of counsel defense and hence did not waive attorney-client privilege for communications with Allstate’s counsel.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 225
  • Page 226
  • Page 227
  • Page 228
  • Page 229
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 263
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs