• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

T.N. v. B.D., No. 49A02-0907-JV-693, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Trial court’s order prohibiting Mother from discussing with the media the knowledge she obtained independent of juvenile proceedings was an invalid prior restraint on Mother’s free speech rights.

Harrison v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC, No. 49A04-0912-CV-722, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Water company was not a governmental entity or a political subdivision of the State entitled to the protections of the Indiana Tort Claims Act.

City of Indianapolis v. Duffitt, No. 49A04-0911-CV-661, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Because Defendant-City’s actions were discretionary functions, Plaintiff’s tort claim was barred under the Indiana Tort Claims Act.

Alves v. Old National Bank, No. 71A03-0909-CV-416, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 1, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Petitioner’s Trial Rule 60(B) motion for relief from judgment was untimely because: (1) he filed it more than one year after the trial court granted summary judgment against him, and (2) his earlier appeal of that judgment did not toll the one-year limit applicable to motions brought under Rule 60(B)(1)-(4).

KB Home Indiana, Inc. v. Rockville TBD Corp., No. 49A02-0909-CV-881, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2010)

June 29, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Owner’s action in negligence for defendant’s discharge of pollutants onto real property that was once farmland but subsequently became a residential subdivision was not barred by the economic loss doctrine.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 226
  • Go to page 227
  • Go to page 228
  • Go to page 229
  • Go to page 230
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs