• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Pistalo v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., No. 45A04-1204-PL-214, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec, 27, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Plaintiff who recovered policy limit from deceased’s auto insurance company and then received an assignment from deceased’s estate of all its rights against insurer thereby had an independent action against the insurer for bad faith failure to settle plaintiff’s claim and could recover prejudgment interest and fees from insurer; reverses summary judgment for insurer on bad faith claim.

Banks v. Banks, No. 45A03-1203-DR-96,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 14, 2012).

December 20, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in modifying and reducing spousal maintenance obligation based on changes in the parties’ respective finances, even when there was no improvement in the medical condition of the party receiving maintenance.

Allen v. Clarian Health Partners, Inc., 49S02-1203-CT-140, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 19, 2012).

December 20, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

A contract doesn’t need to state a specific dollar amount for goods or services in order to be enforceable.

Wisner v. Laney, No. 71S03-1201-CT-7,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 12, 2012).

December 13, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

For purposes of the Tort Prejudgment Interest Statute, a written settlement offer must be made within one year following the filing of a claim to be eligible for prejudgment interest, and the settlement offer can be made prior to the filing of a lawsuit.

Kosarko v. Padula, No. 45S03-1206-CT-310, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 12, 2012).

December 13, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“[T]he Tort Prejudgment Interest Statute abrogates and supplants the common law prejudgment interest rules in cases covered by the statute.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 186
  • Go to page 187
  • Go to page 188
  • Go to page 189
  • Go to page 190
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs