A petition to disestablish maternity is not cognizable, but maternity can be indirectly disestablished by a putative mother petitioning the court for the establishment of maternity and proving her maternity by clear and convincing evidence.
Civil
Gates v. City of Indianapolis, No. 49A04-1210-OV-503, __ N.E.2d __, (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2013).
Defendant is entitled to a jury trial on alleged violations of municipal ordinances.
In re Mandate of Funds for Center Township of Marion Co. Small Claims Court, No. 49S00-1207-MF-420, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 28, 2013).
The Supreme Court approved the renovations, additional staff, and the mandate prohibiting the relocation of the court for the Center Township Marion Co. Small Claims Court, and disapproved the mandated salary increases.
Ramsey v. Lightning Corp., No. 49A02-1209-CC-705, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 2, 2013).
“Trial Rule 23 supports the conclusion that the trial court may amend, alter, modify and even revoke or rescind a previous order certifying a class.”
Tillman v. Tillman, No. 87A05-1212-DR-619, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 3, 2013).
Guardians of incapacitated persons do not have authority to petition for dissolution of marriage on the incapacitated person’s behalf.