• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., Inc., No. 54S01-1610-CT-546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 4, 2017).

May 8, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Unauthorized immigrants can pursue claims for decreased earning capacity damages. Unauthorized immigration status is admissible only if the evidence’s proponent shows by a preponderance of evidence that the plaintiff will be deported.

L.G. v. S.L., No. 29A04-1607-AD-1756, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2017).

May 8, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

There was an appearance of impropriety when the attorney for one side wrote a letter of recommendation for the trial court judge while the case was pending; trial court judge should have recused himself from the proceedings.

KS & E Sports v. Runnels, No. 32S01-1704-PC-226, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 24, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, R. Rucker, Supreme

A firearms seller is immune from a damages suit for injuries caused by another person’s misuse of a firearm, but the seller is not immune from a public nuisance claim seeking equitable relief.

Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., No. 49S02-1704-CT-253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 26, 2017).

May 1, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

By entering into a contract containing language that required general contractor to assume responsibility for implementing and monitoring safety precautions and programs for all individuals working on the site, and by agreeing to designate a safety representative to supervise such implementation and monitoring, the general contractor affirmatively demonstrated an intent to assume a nondelegable duty of care toward the subcontractor.

McKeen v. Turner, No. 53S05-1704-CT-202, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 7, 2017).

April 10, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Plaintiff may raise any theories of alleged malpractice during litigation following the Medical Review Panel process if (1) the proposed complaint encompasses the theories, and (2) the evidence relating to those theories was before the Medical Review Panel.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 115
  • Go to page 116
  • Go to page 117
  • Go to page 118
  • Go to page 119
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs