Statute requiring Department of Child Services (DCS) to protect reporter identity (Ind. Code § 31-33-18-2) does not create a a private right of action; there was also no common-law basis for to impose a duty on DCS for confidentiality.
Civil
Estate of Kent v. Kerr, No. 55A01-1612-ES-2907, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2017).
Prior to the decedent’s death, Ind. Code § 29-1-9-1 permits the prospective beneficiaries of a future inheritance to execute a family settlement agreement to determine their anticipated rights or interests in the decedent’s estate.
Price v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 49S05-1705-PL-285, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 28, 2017).
A judicial mandate cannot be issued to control Department of Child Services caseload requirements.
Bd. of Cmm’r of Union Cty. v. McGuinness, No. 81S01-1708-PL-529, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 15, 2017).
County did not have third-party standing to sue on behalf of its residents.
Jones v. Wilson, No. 03A04-1701-PL-233, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2017).
Using the broad type of plaintiff/broad type of harm analysis, third-party criminal act was not foreseeable. Defendant, wrestling event promoter, had no duty to plaintiff, attendee, who was attacked in the parking lot leaving the event.