• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Gunderson v. State, No. 46S03-1706-PL-423, __ N.E.3d __(Ind., Feb. 14, 2018).

February 19, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

The boundary separating public trust land from privately-owned riparian land along the shores of Lake Michigan is the common-law ordinary high-water mark and that, absent an authorized legislative conveyance, the State retains exclusive title up to that boundary.

Orange v. Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, No. 29A02-1707-MI-1549, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2018).

February 5, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Ind. Code § 9-30-16-3 does not require trial courts to hold a hearing prior to making a decision on a petition for specialized driving privileges.

In re Paternity of I.I.P, No. 63A01-1706-JP-1265, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2018).

February 5, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, P. Riley

Although Legal Father had been established by paternity affidavit and Ind. Code §16-37-2-2.1 was inapplicable, Legal Father was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Mother’s petition to establish paternity when Mother and Biological Father could possibly disestablish paternity under Ind. Code § 31-14-5-3.

Boots v. D. Young Chevrolet, LLC, No. 29A04-1708-PL-1948, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 1, 2018).

February 5, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Under the Buyback Vehicle Disclosure Law (Ind. Code §24-5-13.5-10) after a buyback vehicle has been corrected by the manufacturer, it may not be resold unless the dealer provides the extended warranty and discloses the vehicle’s condition to the buyer with the written statement.

Fort Wayne Community Schools v. Haney, No. 02A03-1708-CT-1829, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 5, 2018).

February 5, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Teacher’s conduct, walking by and touching student’s posterior to induce her to sit back down into her seat, falls within the scope of the teacher’s statutory qualified immunity as a teacher managing a classroom; student’s § 1983 claim also fails because, as a matter of law, student failed to show that teacher’s conduct could have violated a clearly established right.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 101
  • Go to page 102
  • Go to page 103
  • Go to page 104
  • Go to page 105
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs