• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Kramer v. Kramer, No. 71S04-1503-PL-132, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 17, 2015).

March 19, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Defendant committed a separate breach of contract for each transaction violating the non-competition clause.

Ball State University v. Irons, No. 45S03-1503-DR-134, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2015).

March 19, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

University should not have been added as a supplemental defendant in a woman’s petition to seek postsecondary expenses for her daughter.

State v. Cunningham, No. 19S05-1409-CR-599, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 2, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, R. Rucker, Supreme

Police validly required motorist to submit to a pat-down as a condition for allowing him to get out of his truck during a traffic stop, and the officer’s simple query about a pill bottle detected in the motorist’s pocket did not improperly extend the scope of the stop.

Griesmer v. State, No. 49S04-1408-CR-564, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 5, 2015).

March 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, R. Rucker, Supreme

Entrapment defense failed due to failure to prove alleged criminal conduct was the product of law enforcement action.

Wesheit v. State, No. 10S00-1307-DP-492, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 18, 2015).

February 19, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Defendant failed to show that denial of his challenges for cause to prospective jurors and his consequent exhaustion of his peremptories had the result of forcing him to accept objectionable jurors. Trial court properly determined that juror’s wife’s note given to jurors with cookies she baked did not require a mistrial. Opinion also rejects contention that capital jury’s failure to list mitigating circumstances indicated the jury failed to consider the mitigation evidence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 97
  • Go to page 98
  • Go to page 99
  • Go to page 100
  • Go to page 101
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs