• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Town of Zionsville v. Town of Whitestown, No. 06S01-1601-PL-36, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 22, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“2014 Zionsville-Perry Reorganization is not prohibited and that Whitestown may not adopt annexation ordinances annexing territory in municipalities that are the result of completed reorganizations under the [Government Modernization] Act.”

Beasley v. State, No. 49S02-1601-CR-20, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Jan. 14, 2016).

January 15, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Trial court acted within its discretion under Evid. R. 804(b)(3) to admit murder victim’s hearsay statement that he shot at defendant the night before as a “statement against interest”; statement was unambiguous and had a great “tendency … to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability,” even though declarant believed he had acted in self-defense.

Hewitt v. Westfield Washington School Corp., No. 29S04-1506-PL-00377, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 15, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

The teacher’s termination statute (Ind. Code § 20-28-7.5-1 et seq.) does not apply to termination of an administrator when the underlying teaching contract is not terminated.

AM General LLC v. Armour, No. 71S03-1507-PL-407, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2015).

December 21, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

When employer offered employee a subordinate promissory note as payment, employer failed to satisfy its obligation under the employment agreement requiring payment in cash or a cash equivalent.

Knighten v. E. Chicago Housing Authority, No. 45S04-1512-CT-686, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 8, 2015).

December 14, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Genuine issues of material fact on whether employer should be liable under the theory of respondeat superior precluded summary judgment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 88
  • Go to page 89
  • Go to page 90
  • Go to page 91
  • Go to page 92
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 174
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs