Driver who was unable to produce his driver’s license, avoided answering request for his address, evaded questions about his name, and repeatedly refused to provide his date of birth, was guilty of violating refusal-to-identify statute at Ind. Code § 34-28-5-3.5.
Supreme
State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. Jakubowicz, N0. 45$05-1605-CT-00253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 26, 2016).
The insurance policy is ambiguous and must be construed in favor of the injured when the insurance policy provision requiring an insured to bring suit within three years is in direct conflict with the policy’s requirement that it will pay only if the underinsured motorist’s insurance has been exhausted.
Jay Classroom Teachers Ass’n. v. Jay School Corp., No. 49S05-1603-PL-113, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2016).
Given the deferential standard of review for agency action, the court upheld the Indiana Education Employment Relations Board factfinder’s decision.
Bradley v. State, No. 49S05-1602-CR-83, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 7, 2016).
Houseguest did not have authority to consent to police entry without a warrant and all evidence seized was inadmissible.
State v. Marion Superior Court, No. No. 49S00-1605-OR-294, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 5, 2016).
Supreme Court granted the original action seeking to compel change of judge on remand.