Trial court properly ordered state police officers to turn over to federal authorities cash believed to be the proceeds of drug trafficking that was seized through a valid search warrant.
Supreme
Tunstall v. Manning, No. 19S-CT-18, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 26, 2019).
An expert witness’s professional-licensure status and the reasons for professional discipline may be admissible to challenge the expert’s credibility.
IBM v. State, No. 49D01-1005-PL-21451, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 26, 2019).
Under Ind. Code § 34-13-1-6, post-judgment interest runs from the judgment on remand.
In re Eq.W., No. 18S-JC-603, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2019).
The claim preclusion branch of res judicata applies to CHINS proceedings; if the State wishes to refile after a CHINS petition is dismissed, it must show that the new CHINS petition contains allegations of material fact that could not have been included in the dismissed action.
Horner v. Curry, No. 18S-PL-333, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2019).
It is constitutional that the legislature has directed that funds collected under the Indiana’s Civil Forfeiture Statute reimburse law enforcement costs before the transfer of proceeds from seized property to the Common School Fund.