• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Johnson v. State, No. 20S-CR-61, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 22, 2020).

May 26, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

A general waiver of a right to appeal a sentence in plea agreement, when contained in the same sentence as an unenforceable waiver of post-conviction relief, is insufficiently explicit to establish a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal a sentence.

FM Nephrology Partners N. Central Ind. Dialysis Centers, LLC v. Meritain Health, Inc., No. 20S-PL-302, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 11, 2020).

May 18, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Case was not preempted by ERISA when a health-care provider sued defendant health-insurance plans, which are governed by ERISA, allege they failed to pay agreed reimbursement rates for covered services under their plans.

In re R.L.., No. 20S-JC-296, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 5, 2020).

May 11, 2020 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

DCS was barred from filing a successive CHINS action after the first petition was dismissed with prejudice. DCS “cannot engage in piecemeal litigation to get subsequent bites at the same apple.”

Robertson v. State, No. 19S-PL-432, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 30, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, S. David, Supreme

For the claims to recover public funds pursuant to Ind. Code § 5-11-5-1(a), the limitations period begins to run only after the Office of the Indiana Attorney General receives a final, verified report from the State Board of Accounts. Claims pursuant to the Crime Victims Relief Act are governed by the discovery rule.

Perkins v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, No. 20S-CT-233, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 31, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, M. Massa, Supreme

Testimony compelled by a subpoena or other statutory duty is protected under the public policy exception to at-will employment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 41
  • Go to page 42
  • Go to page 43
  • Go to page 44
  • Go to page 45
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 174
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs