• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Harris v. State, 20S-CR-546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 24, 2021).

March 29, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Although Indiana Rule of Evidence 615(c) is the proper vehicle to permit a parent-witness to remain in the courtroom despite a separation-of witnesses order, the exception is not automatic; child defendants must still affirmatively show their parent’s presence is “essential.”

Williams v. State, 21S-CR-113, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 16, 2021).

March 22, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

To constitute a valid waiver of the right to appeal a sentence, the plea agreement, guilty plea and sentencing hearing colloquy, and sentencing order must be clear and consistent as to whether a defendant waives only the right to appeal the conviction or the right to appeal the conviction and sentence.

Poore v. Indianapolis Public Schools No. 21S-CT-105, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2021).

March 22, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

School system met its duty to provide student with classes necessary to graduate with a Core 40 Academic Honors Diploma.

G&G Oil Co. of Ind., Inc. v. Continental Western Ins. Co., No. 20S-PL-617, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2021).

March 22, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

In an insurance coverage dispute, although company’s losses “resulted directly from the use of a computer. whether the ransomware attack “fraudulently caused a transfer of money” cannot be resolved by summary judgment.

In re Adoption of I.B., No. 21S-AD-90, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 2, 2021).

March 8, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

Mother’s consent for adoption was not required when mother failed for one year (1) to significantly communicate with child without justification or (2) to support child when able to do so and required by law.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 31
  • Go to page 32
  • Go to page 33
  • Go to page 34
  • Go to page 35
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 172
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs