• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

WTHR-TV v. Hamilton Se. Sch. Dist., No. 21S-MI-345, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 13, 2022).

January 18, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Ind. Code § 5-14-3-4(b)(8) requires public agencies to provide certain types of information, but it does not require them to provide the underlying documents.

K.G. v. Smith, No. 21S-CT-561, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 22, 2021).

January 3, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

When a caretaker assumes responsibility for a child, and when that caretaker owes a duty of care to the child’s parent or guardian, a claim against the caretaker for the negligent infliction of emotional distress may proceed when the parent or guardian later discovers, with irrefutable certainty, that the caretaker sexually abused that child and when that abuse severely impacted the parent or guardian’s emotional health.

Clark County REMC v. Reis, No. 21S-CT-343, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 29, 2021).

January 3, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Board policy, which established reimbursement benefits for former directors, was not an offer because it did not convey with reasonable certainty promises manifesting an intention or invitation to contract with another; no contract existed.

Hall v. State, No. 20S-LW-00660, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 17, 2021).

December 20, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Life without parole was an appropriate sentence for woman who hired someone to murder her stepfather.

Lowe v. N. Ind. Commuter Transp. Dist., No. 21S-CT-295, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2021).

December 20, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Northern District Commuter Transportation District is apolitical subdivision for purposes of the Indiana Tort Claims Act so was subject to its 180-day notice requirement

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to page 30
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 173
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs