The General Assembly’s recent codification of Criminal Rule 26 enhance, rather than restrict, the broad discretion entrusted to trial courts when executing bail.
Supreme
Residences at Ivy Quad Unit Owners Assoc., Inc. v. Ivy Quad Development, LLC, No. 21S-PL-294, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 25, 2022).
At the pleading stage, the viability of a plaintiff’s claim is measured by its sufficiency, not its likelihood of success, so a plaintiff’s complaint need only contain facts that support the possibility of relief.
Isom v. Neal, No. 21S-CQ-545, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 28, 2022).
A petition for post-conviction relief tendered to a trial court without the verification required by Post-Conviction Rule 1 is not properly filed.
State v. Katz, No. 20S-CR-632, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 18, 2022).
Ind. Code § 35-45-4-8, which criminalizes the non-consensual distribution of an intimate image, does not violate the free interchange clause of the Indiana Constitution, or the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
WTHR-TV v. Hamilton Se. Sch. Dist., No. 21S-MI-345, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 13, 2022).
Ind. Code § 5-14-3-4(b)(8) requires public agencies to provide certain types of information, but it does not require them to provide the underlying documents.