Prompt admonition to jury to disregard lay witness’s statement in violation of motion in limine “though you have never heard of it,” together with other circumstances of the trial, avoided need for mistrial.
Supreme
Breaston v. State, No. 20S04-0810-CR-561, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 16, 2009)
Rule that habitual offender portions of sentences cannot be consecutive applies even when mandatory consecutivity statute applies.
Farris v. State, No. 02S03-0904-PC-181, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 17, 2009)
Consecutive habitual offender sentences are not authorized when related charges are tried in separate causes.
Bailey v. State, No. 49S02-0812-CR-00630, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 18, 2009)
Disorderly conduct’s “tumultuous conduct” may occur “when the aggressor appears well on his way to inflicting serious bodily injury but relents in the face of superior force or creative resistance.”
Burke v. Bennett, No. 84S01-0904-CV-148, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 16, 2009)
Mayoral candidate’s allegation that his opponent was disqualified due to certain pre-election employment was inapplicable to establish ineligibility in a post-campaign election contest.