• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Meredith v. State, No. 89S04-0808-CR-430, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., May 28, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Rucker, Supreme

Placement of a temporary license plate inside a vehicle’s back window is an infraction, justifying a traffic stop.

Stanley v. Walker, No. 41S01-0810-CV-539, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. May 27, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

In a personal injury case where the amount of medical expenses actually paid by plaintiff was discounted from the amount originally billed because of arrangements between plaintiff’s health insurance company and medical providers, to the extent that discounted amount may be introduced without referencing insurance, it may be used to determine the reasonable value of medical services.

Estate of Margaret H. Prickett v. Womersley, No. 71S03-0808-CV-419, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 13, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Indiana law presumes that services while caring for a person subject to a guardianship are rendered gratuitously if rendered by a family member; the presumption cannot be rebutted by evidence that the person wanted her daughter to be compensated because the person was under a guardianship, and the guardian did not consent.

Bush v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., No. 71S03-0810-CV-558, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 13, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

An uninsured motorist policy restricting coverage to bodily injury or death sustained by an insured does not violate Indiana’s uninsured motorist statute.

Conwell v. Gray Loon Outdoor Marketing Group, Inc., No. 82S04-0806-CV-309, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 19, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

The Uniform Commercial Code did not apply to a suit between a business enterprise and the marketing firm that created and hosted its website; thus the firm may collect for its work under principles of common law contract.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 163
  • Go to page 164
  • Go to page 165
  • Go to page 166
  • Go to page 167
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 171
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs