• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Groce v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., No. 48S02-1307-CT-472, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 4, 2014)

April 3, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Affirms summary judgment for defendant, finding the statute of limitation defense applicable when plaintiff, in the exercise of ordinary diligence in reviewing their homeowners insurance policy, could have timely discovered that the company’s replacement cost liability was capped at the dwelling loss coverage limit.

Robinson v. State, No. 20S04-1307-CR-471, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 25, 2014).

March 27, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, R. Rucker, Supreme

Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to suppress based on conclusion that defendant’s driving gave officer reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop, when testimony of officer convinced trial judge there was reasonable suspicion of “unsafe lane movement” even though squad car video did not clearly demonstrate defendant went off the road though his car did contact the fog line.

State v. Keck, No. 67S01-1403-CR-179, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 25, 2014).

March 27, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Affirms trial court’s grant of motion to suppress which was based on evidence that defendant was permissibly driving “left of center” due to the poor condition of the roadway.

Smith v. State, No. 18S02-1304-CR-297, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 27, 2014).

March 27, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

Affirms high school principal’s conviction for failure to report an instance of suspected child abuse.

In re I.P., No. 49S02-1402-JT-81, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 26, 2014)

March 27, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Parental rights should not be terminated when the magistrate who heard the case resigns before reporting recommended findings and conclusions because it violates the parent’s due process rights.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 114
  • Go to page 115
  • Go to page 116
  • Go to page 117
  • Go to page 118
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 174
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs