“We construe ‘adulterated’ methamphetamine as a final product, not the total weight of an intermediate mixture still undergoing reaction.”
Supreme
Zoeller v. Sweeney, No. 45S00-1309-PL-596, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 6, 2014).
The right-to-work law is constitutional.
Teaching Our Posterity Success, Inc. v. Ind. Dept. of Education, No. 49S05-1411-PL-700, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 6, 2014).
A petitioner seeking judicial review of an agency action must file with the trial court the agency record, defined by the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act, or the petition will be dismissed.
Campbell v. State, No. 13S05-1410-PC-682, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 30, 2014).
Indiana Pattern Jury Instructions – Criminal No. 9.05’s second sentence in its “intentionally” definition (“[i]f a person is charged with intentionally causing a result by his conduct, it must have been his conscious objective not only to engage in the conduct but also to cause the result”) “represents a correct statement of the law.”
Lyons v. Richmond Cmty. School Corp., No. 89S04-1312-PL-788, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 28, 2014).
Because whether a plaintiff has complied with the requirements of the ITCA is one of law, but the answer may depend upon the resolution of disputed facts, the issue should be handled by a carefully drafted jury instruction.