• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Ind. Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Holcomb, No. 49S05-1404-CC-209, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 26, 2014).

August 28, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Indiana’s Medical Malpractice Act’s cap on attorney fees from a Patient Compensation Fund award does not reduce the Fund’s liability.

Gomillia v. State, No. 49S02-1408-CR-521, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 12, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Affirms “this basic premise” – “[w]here a trial court’s reason for imposing a sentence greater than the advisory sentence includes material elements of the offense, absent something unique about the circumstances that would justify deviating from the advisory sentence, that reason is ‘improper as a matter of law.’”

Guilmette v. State, No. 71S04-1310-CR-705, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 13, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Police do not need a separate warrant to test lawfully seized evidence which is unrelated to the crime for which the defendant is in custody.

Erkins v. State, No. 58S01-1309-CR-586, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 22, 2014).

July 24, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

When charge was conspiracy to commit robbery resulting in serious bodily injury, the State was not required to prove there was actual serious bodily injury; amendment changing the allegation of the particular conspirator who committed the overt act required for conspiracy was of form only and was properly allowed in this case.

Fischer v. Heymann, No. 49S02-1309-PL-620, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 17, 2014).

July 24, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Responding to the plaintiff’s demand was not the defendant’s only option to mitigate damages, but the trial court was within its discretion to reduce damages.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 104
  • Go to page 105
  • Go to page 106
  • Go to page 107
  • Go to page 108
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 169
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs