• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

In re M.K., No. 49S02-1505-JC-260, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 12, 2015).

May 14, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“Because the trial court’s remarks and conduct, in their cumulative effect, breached the court’s duty of impartiality and amounted to coercion of Father, we reverse the CHINS adjudication.”

YTC Dream Homes, Inc. v DirectBuy, Inc., No. 45S03-1505-PL-264, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 12, 2015).

May 14, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

The determination of whether an out-of-state attorney is granted temporary admission should be made without restriction by local rule and within the discretion granted by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 3(2) – whether good cause exists for the admission of the attorneys.

Bd. of Commissioners of the County of Jefferson v. Teton Corp., No. 72S04-1410-CT-642, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 13, 2015).

May 14, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Adopts the “any insurance” approach to the AIA waiver—“that as long as a property owner’s damages are covered by any property insurance policy used to insure construction-related damages (i.e., the work), the waiver applies to all damages”

Stephenson v. State, No. 15S00-1401-LW-40, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Apr. 23, 2015).

May 1, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“We decline to find that the mere existence of an attempted suicide, without more, is relevant evidence of a person’s guilty conscience about committing a charged crime,” but in this case Defendant’s suicide attempt approximately a month after the alleged murder was properly admitted as relevant to his motive for committing the crime.

DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. v. Brown, No. 49S02-1504-CT-225, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 24, 2015).

May 1, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

The trial court reasonably concluded that Indiana was the appropriate forum for litigation brought by out-of-state plaintiffs against an in-state manufacturer.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 99
  • Go to page 100
  • Go to page 101
  • Go to page 102
  • Go to page 103
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 175
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs