• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

SCOTUS

Montgomery v. Louisiana, No. 14-280, ___ U.S. ___, (Jan. 25, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, A. Scalia, C. Thomas, SCOTUS

Miller v. Alabama’s prohibition on mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders announced a new substantive, not procedural, rule. Miller is therefore retroactive in cases of state collateral review.

Musacchio v. United States, No. 14-1095, ___ U.S. ___, (Jan. 25, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Thomas, SCOTUS

Sufficiency of evidence review does not depend on how jury was instructed; it is judged against essential elements of the offense, not against erroneous jury instruction that included an additional element.
Statute of limitations defense was not jurisdictional and therefore could not be raised for the first time on appeal.

Kansas v. Carr, No. 14-449, ___ U.S. ___ (Jan. 20, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, S. Sotomayor, SCOTUS

The Eighth Amendment does not require capital-sentencing courts to instruct a jury that mitigating circumstances need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Joint capital-sentencing proceeding did not violate defendants’ Eighth Amendment right to an “individualized sentencing determination.”

Hurst v. Florida, No. 14-7505, ___ U.S. ___ (Jan. 12, 2016).

January 15, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. Alito, S. Breyer, S. Sotomayor, SCOTUS

Florida’s death-penalty statutory scheme, under which judge must find aggravating circumstance justifying death and jury’s sentencing recommendation of death or life without parole is only advisory, violates Sixth Amendment jury right.

Johnson v. United States, No. 13-7120, ___ U.S. ___ (June 26, 2015).

July 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, A. Scalia, C. Thomas, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA)’s definition of “violent felony” is unconstitutionally vague as to its residual clause, which covers any felony that “involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another”; clause leaves uncertainty about how to estimate the risk posed by a crime or how much risk it takes for a crime to qualify as a violent felony. (Overruling James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192 (2007) and Sykes v. United States, 564 U.S. 1 (2011).)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs