• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

R. Rucker

Abbott v. State, No. 34S02-1202-CR-110, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 22, 2012).

February 24, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

Maximum sentence was inappropriate when B felony enhancement was due to the arresting officer’s stopping the defendant’s car a few yards from a church.

Addison v. State, No. 49S05-1105-CR-267, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 22, 2012).

February 24, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

In addressing a Batson challenge by a defendant who failed to rebut the State’s purported race-neutral explanation at trial, the fundamental error standard is used on appeal to evaluate the argument the explanation was a pretext; concludes State’s explanation was a pretext when “the State failed to strike apparently similarly situated non-black venirepersons, . . . mischaracterized Turner’s voir dire testimony when offering its race-neutral reason for striking him from the panel and failed to engage Turner in any meaningful voir dire examination on the issue of his reliance on expert witness testimony.”

Hill v. State, No. 45S03-1105-PC-283, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 24, 2012).

January 27, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

Standard for assessing effective performance of Post-Conviction Rule 2 counsel is the Baum “due-course-of-law” standard, not the two-prong Sixth Amendment Strickland standard.

Renzulli v. State, No. 32S04-1102-CR-117, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 29,2011).

December 29, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

Circumstances sufficiently corroborated concerned citizen’s tip of a possibly intoxicated driver to support an investigative stop.

Hopper v. State, No. 13S01-1007-PC-399, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 29, 2011).

December 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, R. Shepard, Supreme

On rehearing, decides not to adopt original opinion’s supervisory waiver-of-counsel rule requiring advice of an attorney’s ability to negotiate with the State.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 23
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs