Clerk, a garnishee defendant, is liable when she received a motion for proceedings supplemental to garnish the bond in an unrelated criminal case, and the clerk did not provide notice of the lien in the criminal case.
R. Pyle
Lowrance v. State, No. 82A01-1601-CR-61, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 9, 2016).
The trial court’s sentencing statement did not constitute an order reinstating defendant’s substantive right to bear arms.
Love v. State, No. 71A03-1511-CR-2009, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 8, 2016).
Deference will be given to the trial court’s factual determinations unless police video recording indisputably contradicts those findings.
Owens v. State, No. 49A02-1601-CR-41, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., July 29, 2016).
Trial court should have vacated the felony conviction with the less severe penal consequences based on double jeopardy violation.
Simons v. State, No. 20A03-1512-CR-2158, __N.E. 3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2016).
Indiana statute requires sentencing judge to advise defendant of his earliest release date and maximum possible release date, and although such failure was harmless error in this case, the facts of another case might not lead to the same harmless error result.