The trial court’s sentencing statement did not constitute an order reinstating defendant’s substantive right to bear arms.
R. Pyle
Love v. State, No. 71A03-1511-CR-2009, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 8, 2016).
Deference will be given to the trial court’s factual determinations unless police video recording indisputably contradicts those findings.
Owens v. State, No. 49A02-1601-CR-41, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., July 29, 2016).
Trial court should have vacated the felony conviction with the less severe penal consequences based on double jeopardy violation.
Simons v. State, No. 20A03-1512-CR-2158, __N.E. 3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2016).
Indiana statute requires sentencing judge to advise defendant of his earliest release date and maximum possible release date, and although such failure was harmless error in this case, the facts of another case might not lead to the same harmless error result.
ESPN, Inc. v. University of Notre Dame Security Police Dept., No. 71A05-1505-MI-381, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 15, 2016).
Private university’s police department qualified as a “public agency” under the Indiana Access to Public Records Act’s definition and so is required to provide access to its public records not exempted by the Act.