Adopts an objective standard for determining when a statement made by an attorney about a judicial officer violates Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.2(a), “A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge . . . .”
Per Curiam
Chambers v. State, No. 53S01-1307-CR-459, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 2, 2013).
Supreme Court affirms trial court’s consecutive sentences.
Iltzsch v. State, No. 49S02-49S02-1301-CR-57, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 24, 2013).
Remands for a new restitution hearing to allow presentation of additional evidence on losses compensable through restitution, when evidence presented at initial hearing was held insufficient by the Court of Appeals.
In the Matter of Brizzi, No. 49S00-0910-DI-425, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar.13, 2012).
Prosecutor reprimanded for violating ethics limits on public statements about pending prosecutions.
Dawson v. State, No. 49S02-1103-CR-176, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., March 29, 2011)
P-C.R. 2 does not allow belated appeals from orders revoking probation.