• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Per Curiam

Cohen & Malad, LLP v. Daly, No. 29S02-1504-PL-165, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 8, 2015).

April 9, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

“Absent agreement otherwise, ‘a lawyer retained under a contingent fee contract but discharged prior to the contingency is entitled to recover the value of services rendered if there is a subsequent settlement or award[,]’ and in that case, ‘the fee is to be measured by the proportion of the total fee equal to the contribution of the discharged lawyer’s efforts to the ultimate result[.]’”

Grady v. North Carolina, No. 14-593, __ U.S. __ (Mar. 30, 2015).

April 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, SCOTUS

Attachment of a GPS monitor to a recidivist sex offender without his consent is a Fourth Amendment search; as the question of the reasonableness of the GPS monitor “search” in this case was not raised, the Court does not address it.

Kramer v. Kramer, No. 71S04-1503-PL-132, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 17, 2015).

March 19, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Defendant committed a separate breach of contract for each transaction violating the non-competition clause.

Rolley v. Rolley, No. 87S01-1412-DR-739, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2014).

December 18, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Under Ind. Code § 31-16-8-1, an agreed child support order can be modified based on either a substantial and continuing change in circumstances or, after twelve months, a twenty percent deviation.

Corbin v. State, No. 75S03-1401-CR-13, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Sept. 30, 2014).

October 2, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Affirms trial court’s refusal to dismiss attempted child molesting charge, which defendant asserted entailed no more than an invitation, not “urging” or “persuasion.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs