In a dissolution of marriage, the trial court had the discretion to order husband to secure a life insurance policy as security for his equalization payment for division of his pension.
P. Mathias
Knowles v. State, No. 22A-CR-2133, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 7, 2023).
Failure to participate in the completion of a presentence investigation report may be punishable by indirect, rather than direct contempt.
Eminger v. State, No. 22A-CR-1077, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 10, 2023).
Any issue which was raised by, or could have been raised by, a timely motion to correct error and timely direct appeal may not be subject of motion for relief from judgment.
Johnson v. State, No. 22A-CR-427, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2023).
The trial court violated defendant’s federal and state constitutional rights of confrontation when the court required the witnesses to wear masks while testifying without entering specific facts of necessity. However, the error was harmless.
State v. $2,435 in U.S Currency, No. 22A-CR-00578, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 19, 2022).
It is well-settled that the State’s civil forfeiture complaints are outside of Article 1, Section 20, and are equitable claims to be tried by the court.