Reverses restitution order because it rested solely upon victim’s unsupported assertions of loss as related to probation officer and placed in PSI, and holds State may not have a new restitution hearing to present evidence sufficient to support a restitution award.
P. Mathias
Harmon v. State, No. 20A03-1110-CR-529, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 28, 2012).
Evidence was insufficient to prove the weight of the manufactured methamphetamine was three grams or more, as required for A felony manufacturing.
Key v. Hamilton, No. 48A02-1007-CT-81, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2012).
“[A] signaling driver may owe a duty of care to a third party motorist as a matter of law when his actions result in the reasonable reliance by the signaled driver that traffic is clear.”
Jennings v. State, No. 53A01-1010-CR-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2010).
Misdemeanor sentencing addressed on rehearing.
Jennings v. State, No. 53A01-1010-CR-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., October 27, 2011).
B misdemeanor sentence of 30 executed, 150 suspended, and 365 probation exceeded the statutory one year maximum combined imprisonment and probation limit.