Federal sex offender registry statutes and their obligations for defendant did not affect the Indiana law conclusion that a state resident whose out-of-state sex offense conviction predated Indiana sex offender registry statutes could not, under the Indiana Constitution ex post facto Wallace holding, be required to register on the Indiana registry.
P. Mathias
Iltzsch v. State, No. 49A02-1112-CR-1164, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2012).
Reverses restitution order because it rested solely upon victim’s unsupported assertions of loss as related to probation officer and placed in PSI, and holds State may not have a new restitution hearing to present evidence sufficient to support a restitution award.
Harmon v. State, No. 20A03-1110-CR-529, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 28, 2012).
Evidence was insufficient to prove the weight of the manufactured methamphetamine was three grams or more, as required for A felony manufacturing.
Key v. Hamilton, No. 48A02-1007-CT-81, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2012).
“[A] signaling driver may owe a duty of care to a third party motorist as a matter of law when his actions result in the reasonable reliance by the signaled driver that traffic is clear.”
Jennings v. State, No. 53A01-1010-CR-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2010).
Misdemeanor sentencing addressed on rehearing.