To trigger the 180-day statute of limitations extension for a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must show that she has subsequently acquired knowledge of or received information about something she did not previously know with regard to her injury and $15,000 is insufficient to compensate her for that more serious injury.
P. Mathias
Mathews v. State, No. 01A02-1601-CR-104, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 12, 2016).
A party seeking judicial recusal must properly bring a Criminal Rule 12 motion, and is not entitled to relief based solely on obligations under the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Yeager v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., No. 22A04-1604-MF-727, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2016).
In a mortgage foreclosure, a trial court must hold a hearing or to otherwise obtain information to determine the amount of the defendant’s provisional monthly payment.
State v. Timbs, No. 27A04-1511-MI-1976, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2016).
Forfeiture of a vehicle worth four times the amount of the maximum fine of the crime was excessive.
Sedam v. 2Jr Pizza Enterprises, No. 39A05-1602-CT-296, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 27, 2016).
An employer’s admission that its employee committed the alleged negligent act within the course and scope of her employment does not preclude an action for negligent hiring, training, supervision, and retention.