Trial court infringed upon the custodial rights of parent by delegating decision-making as to child’s need for therapy to a service provider.
N. Vaidik
Paquette v. State, No. 63A04-1612-CR-2891, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 21, 2017).
Defendant may only be sentenced and convicted of a single count of resisting law enforcement even when the act of resistance caused multiple deaths.
Totton v. Bukofchan No. 24A01-1612-CT-2849, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2017).
If a non-physician healthcare provider, such as a chiropractor, is not qualified under Evidence Rule 702 to render an opinion as to medical causation because the causation issue is complex, then chiropractors sitting on medical review panels are likewise not qualified to render opinions as to medical causation when the causation issue is complex.
Jones v. State, No. 49A02-1611-CR-2513, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 12, 2017).
When defendant is convicted after a trial to the court, the right to waive allocution is personal to the defendant and may not be waived by counsel.
Jenner v. Bloomington Cellular Services, Inc., No. 53A05-1606-MI-1415, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 12, 2017).
Tax sale purchasers must provide notice to any person with a substantial, publicly recorded interest even if their interest lies outside the chain of title. “Requiring a tax-sale purchaser to search outside the chain of title—even if it means searching thousands of records in the county recorder’s office—is one of the safeguards created by the statute.”