To trigger the 180-day statute of limitations extension for a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must show that she has subsequently acquired knowledge of or received information about something she did not previously know with regard to her injury and $15,000 is insufficient to compensate her for that more serious injury.
M. Robb
Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Watson, No. 45A03-1607-MI-1538, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App, Jan. 23, 2016).
Although labeled otherwise, plaintiff’s Motion to Issue a Valid Driver’s License Credential effectively asked the trial court to engage in judicial review of an agency action and plaintiff was required to comply with the Indiana Administrative Orders and Procedures Act.
Skipworth v. State, No. 49A02-1605-CR-973, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 10, 2017).
Trial court has authority to order defendant to complete domestic violence counseling even though he was not convicted of domestic battery when it is reasonably related to the crime.
Price v. Ind. Dept. of Child Services, No. 49A05-1602-PL-380, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 25, 2016).
Plaintiff has no private case of action under Ind. Code. § 31-25-2-5 to enforce the maximum caseload standard against the Department of Child Services, but can proceed with her mandate action.
Meridian Health Services v. Bell, No. 71A04-1511-DR-2005, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 14, 2016).
Health care provider was required to release a child’s mental health care records to the child’s father; trial court properly held the health care provider in contempt for not providing the records to father.