Trial court properly granted TR 60(B)(8) motion because equitable considerations can constitute the exceptional circumstances required to grant the motion.
M. May
Akehurst v. State, No. 18A-CR-214, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2018).
Defendant’s restitution payment is limited to victim’s lost earnings incurred before, and not including, the date of sentencing.
Ervin v. State, No. 18A-CR-965, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 28, 2018).
Defendant could not have been acting in defense of his property or others as he was not in a place he was allowed to be, so the jury instruction on property defense was properly denied.
Scott v. Carrico, No. 59A01-1712-CT-2878, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2018).
Tort claims related to an estate can be brought in civil court, if the claims at issue were not known until after the probate court statute of limitations has passed.
In re the Civil Commitment of L.J., No. 18A-MH-152, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 17, 2018).
A blanket CB order approving all recommendations and findings of a magistrate, commissioner and/or referee does not make a magistrate, commissioner and/or referees’ orders final.