Jury instruction regarding accomplice liability, without mention of intent, was an incorrect statement of law, and the error was not harmless.
M. Massa
Robertson v. B.O., No. 49S04-1111-CT-671, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 31, 2012).
Indiana Code § 34-18-15-3(5) precludes the Patient Compensation Fund from disputing the existence or cause of the plaintiff’s claimed injury.
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Barabas, No. 48S04-1204-CC-00213, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 4, 2012).
MERS was an agent of the lender. Citimortgage, standing in MERS’s shoes, has standing to intervene in the mortgage foreclosure action.
Dye v. State, No. 20S04-1201-CR-5, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 31, 2012).
Habitual offender enhancement may not be imposed on conviction of possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.
Castillo v. State, No. 45S00-1102-LW-110, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 31, 2012).
When evidence showed defendant’s boyfriend killed her child and that she was an accomplice to the murder, the life without parole sentence for her was inappropriate; revises murder sentence to 65 years.