Any offense that causes the victim physical pain meets the test “bodily injury” requirement for domestic battery.
M. Massa
Kane v. State, No. 30S04-1206-CR-372, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 30, 2012).
Jury instruction regarding accomplice liability, without mention of intent, was an incorrect statement of law, and the error was not harmless.
Robertson v. B.O., No. 49S04-1111-CT-671, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 31, 2012).
Indiana Code § 34-18-15-3(5) precludes the Patient Compensation Fund from disputing the existence or cause of the plaintiff’s claimed injury.
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Barabas, No. 48S04-1204-CC-00213, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 4, 2012).
MERS was an agent of the lender. Citimortgage, standing in MERS’s shoes, has standing to intervene in the mortgage foreclosure action.
Dye v. State, No. 20S04-1201-CR-5, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 31, 2012).
Habitual offender enhancement may not be imposed on conviction of possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.