In an adoption, consent is not required from the father, who by clear and convincing evidence was able to support his children but did not.
M. Massa
Hardiman v. Cozmanoff, No. 45S03-1309-CT-619, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., March 12, 2014).
In the related civil case while the criminal case was pending, trial court properly granted a limited stay of discovery as to defendant only and required defendant to answer the complaint within 30 days.
Kelly v. State, No. 30S01-1303-CR-220 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 21, 2013).
Reverses motion to suppress evidence found in a search of defendant’s vehicle and inculpatory statements that defendant made to police.
Garrett v. State, No. 49S04-1207-PC-431, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 28, 2013).
“[T]he ‘actual evidence’ test . . . is applicable to cases in which there has been an acquittal on one charge and retrial on another charge after a hung jury.”
Schoettmer v. Wright, No. 49S04-1210-CT-607, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 27, 2013).
Equitable estoppel can prevent defendant from using the Indiana Tort Claims Act time limit as a defense.