• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M. Barnes

Killebrew v. State, No. 49A05-0905-CR-246, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 6, 2010)

April 9, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes, P. Mathias

Defendant established prosecutor’s neutral explanations for peremptory strike were pretextual and hence violated Batson rule when white jurors were not struck after giving answers the same as struck African-American’s and trial judge made no finding on prosecutor’s assertion about struck juror’s “emphatic” demeanor.

Palacios v. State, No. 29A02-0908-CR-750, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 26, 2010)

January 29, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, M. Barnes

Daughter’s translation of her mother’s statements to investigating officer were admissible under the present sense impression hearsay exception.

Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. 55A04-0902-CV-70, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 12, 2010)

January 22, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

(1) The six-year statute of limtitations on “[a]ctions on accounts and contracts not in writing,” governs credit card accounts; (2) because a credit card is akin to an open account, the statute of limitations begins to run from the date the account is due; (3) whether “the date the account is due” is the date of debtor’s last payment or the next due date, the credit card company in this case filed its lawsuit more than six years after both of those dates; (4) whether a credit card company can invoke an optional acceleration clause to delay the statute of limitations, the credit card company in this case did not properly invoke such a clause, because it did not take any affirmative action to notify the debtor of its intent to do so.

Vanderlinden v. State, No. 49A02-0905-CR-417, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 18, 2009)

December 30, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Evidence defendant was speeding sufficed to prove the “endangerment” element of Class A misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.

Davidson v. State, No. 49A02-0904-CR-287, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 30, 2009)

December 4, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, M. Barnes

Describes split in Court of Appeals cases as to whether suspended or other non-executed portions of a sentence count the same as incarceration portions of sentence in Appellate Rule 7(B) sentence appropriateness analysis.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs