• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

L. Rush

D.A. v. State, No. 48S02-1604-MI-183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 1, 2016).

September 6, 2016 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“Under the plain language of Indiana Code section 35-38-9-4, civil forfeitures are not included within the “conviction records” that may be expunged.”

Day v. State, No. 24C02-1501-CM-70, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 29, 2016).

August 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Indiana disorderly conduct statute (Ind. Code § 35-45-1-3) includes both public and private disturbances, but only physical, and not verbal, altercations.

Jay Classroom Teachers Ass’n. v. Jay School Corp., No. 49S05-1603-PL-113, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2016).

July 25, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, R. Rucker, Supreme

Given the deferential standard of review for agency action, the court upheld the Indiana Education Employment Relations Board factfinder’s decision.

Siner v. Kindred Hospital LP, No. 49S05-1604-CT-219, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 28, 2016).

May 2, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

In this medical malpractice case, the defendants’ own designated evidence revealed conflicting medical opinions on the element of causation creating a genuine issue of material fact.

Horton v. State, No. 79S02-1510-CR-628, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., April 21, 2016).

April 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Defendant’s personal waiver of second-phase jury trial was required; counsel could not waive it on defendant’s behalf, even though defendant had just been through first phase of bifurcated trial.
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in taking judicial notice of prior case file as evidence of defendant’s prior conviction, because file was readily and publicly available and cause number was repeatedly an unambiguously identified on the record; however, better practice would have been to formally enter the relevant documents into the record.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs