Unauthorized immigrants can pursue claims for decreased earning capacity damages. Unauthorized immigration status is admissible only if the evidence’s proponent shows by a preponderance of evidence that the plaintiff will be deported.
L. Rush
Beville v. State, No. 84S01-1606-CR-347, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 17, 2017).
The State has the burden of proving the essential elements of an informer’s privilege before the burden shifts to the defendant to prove an exception to that privilege.
Megenity v. Dunn, No. 22S04-1609-CT-465, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 16, 2017).
A sports participant breaches no duty as a matter of law by engaging in “ordinary conduct” for the sport generally.
In re Termination of Bi.B., No. 54S01-1612-JT-630, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 17, 2017).
That Department of Child Services failed to allege that one of the three waiting periods giving parents time to reunify with their children had in fact passed is fatal to their petitions to terminate Father’s parental rights.
Kennedy Tank & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Emmert Industrial Corp., No. 49S02-1608-CT-431, __N.E.3d__ (Ind., Jan. 3, 2016).
Indiana’s 10-year statute of limitations is not preempted by the federal statute of limitations in the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act.