Res gestae is no longer a proper basis for admitting evidence; instead, admissibility is determined under Indiana’s Rules of Evidence.
L. Rush
Harris v. State, No. 45S03-1703-CR-172, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 22, 2017).
Although properly admitted evidence was not relevant to his alleged crimes at a joint trial, defendant waived his fair trial argument because he never moved for a separate trial and he first raised the issue at oral argument.
Zanders v. State, No. 15S01-1611-CR-571, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 4, 2017).
Under the third-party doctrine, police are not required to obtain a search warrant to get historical cell-site location information from a cell phone provider.
Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., Inc., No. 54S01-1610-CT-546, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 4, 2017).
Unauthorized immigrants can pursue claims for decreased earning capacity damages. Unauthorized immigration status is admissible only if the evidence’s proponent shows by a preponderance of evidence that the plaintiff will be deported.
Beville v. State, No. 84S01-1606-CR-347, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 17, 2017).
The State has the burden of proving the essential elements of an informer’s privilege before the burden shifts to the defendant to prove an exception to that privilege.