• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

G. Slaughter

Duke Energy Ind., LLC v. Carmel, No. 23S-EX-129, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 30, 2024).

June 3, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, G. Slaughter, M. Massa

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission properly held that city ordinance was unreasonable and void because it threatened to impose unreasonable expenses on an energy company, which would in turn impact all of the energy company’s customers throughout Indiana.

Cosme v. Clark, No. 24S-CT-159, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 6, 2024).

May 13, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

At the directed-verdict stage, a judge can review whether inferences from the evidence are reasonable, but it cannot weigh conflicting evidence or assess witness credibility.

G.W. v. State, No. 23S-JV-246, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., Apr. 10, 2024).

April 15, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

When a juvenile court fails to enter the requisite findings of fact in its dispositional order, an appellate court should neither affirm nor reverse. Instead, the proper remedy is to remand the case under Ind. App. R. 66(C)(8) while holding the appeal in abeyance.

State ex. rel. Allen v. Carroll Cir. Ct., No. 23S‐OR‐311, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 8, 2024).

February 12, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: D. Molter, G. Slaughter, Supreme

The trial court lacked the authority to remove counsel without considering other, less drastic options and weighing the prejudice to the defendant.

Morehouse v. Dux North, LLC, No. 23S-PL-71, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 8, 2024).

February 12, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

For an implied easement by prior use, the claimed servitude must predate the severance creating the separate parcels. For an implied easement of necessity, the claimed necessity need arise only at severance and not before.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs