• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

E. Tavitas

Atkins v. Crawford County Clerk’s Office, No. 20A-MI-2160, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 1, 2021).

June 7, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Trial court improperly denied a motion to waive the filing fee when plaintiff filed a verified affidavit of indigency with documentation of her cash assets. If the trial court had any doubt about plaintiff’s indigency, the trial court could have waived the filing fee, and, upon a later discovery that the litigant has the means to pay, order reimbursement of the waived fee; or a trial court may hold a hearing to examine the litigant’s potential indigency.

AO Alfa-Bank v. Doe, No. 20A-MI-2352, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 19, 2021).

May 24, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to consider a motion to quash an out-of-state subpoena which had not been domesticated.

Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Assoc. v. Finnerty, No. 20A-CT-1069, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2021).

May 11, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, M. Robb

Motion to certify interlocutory appeal was deemed denied when the trial court did not rule on it within thirty days of filing; the trial court could not revive the motion by belatedly granting it. Repetitive motion was a motion to reconsider and also was untimely.

Vonhoene v. State, 20A-CR-328, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 18, 2021).

March 22, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

A defendant has the right to counsel at each critical stage of a criminal matter, unless the defendant relinquishes that right by waiver, forfeiture, or forfeiture with knowledge.

Demby v. State, 20A-CR-1012, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2021).

February 22, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

While aggravated battery is not an inherently included lesser offense of attempted murder, it may become a lesser-included offense depending on how it is charged. Pursuant to Wadle, if the factual circumstances and charging information render aggravated battery a lesser-included offense of attempted murder, the aggravated battery conviction would violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs