The evaluation of whether the continuous crime doctrine applies is distinct from the question of whether the continuous crime doctrine has been violated.
E. Tavitas
Crawfordsville Town & Country Home Center, Inc. v. Cordova, No. 18A-CT-314, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2019).
Equipment rental company had no duty to provide bilingual warnings for an aerial lift when warnings were given by the manufacturer and were clearly visible.
Harkins v. Westmeyer, No. 15A01-1703-CT-530, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 10, 2018).
T.R. 6(E)’s 3-day extension does not apply when the order creates a deadline from the date of the order.
In re Civil Commitment of T.W., No. 18A-MH-1148, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2018).
Although commissioner could not enter a final appealable order for temporary commitment, appellate review of the issue was waived because commitment order was not objected to prior to appeal.