The unlawful-entry statute, prohibiting a serious sex offender from entering school property, is not an unconstitutional ex post facto law as applied to defendant who had to stop attending his son’s school events.
E. Tavitas
Heckard v. State, No. 18A-CR-1376, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 11, 2019).
The evaluation of whether the continuous crime doctrine applies is distinct from the question of whether the continuous crime doctrine has been violated.
Crawfordsville Town & Country Home Center, Inc. v. Cordova, No. 18A-CT-314, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2019).
Equipment rental company had no duty to provide bilingual warnings for an aerial lift when warnings were given by the manufacturer and were clearly visible.
Harkins v. Westmeyer, No. 15A01-1703-CT-530, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 10, 2018).
T.R. 6(E)’s 3-day extension does not apply when the order creates a deadline from the date of the order.
In re Civil Commitment of T.W., No. 18A-MH-1148, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2018).
Although commissioner could not enter a final appealable order for temporary commitment, appellate review of the issue was waived because commitment order was not objected to prior to appeal.