Trial court may not issue a blanket order denying the return of videos containing sexually explicit material.
E. Tavitas
State v. Kirby, No. 18A-PL-2334, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 4, 2019).
The unlawful-entry statute, prohibiting a serious sex offender from entering school property, is not an unconstitutional ex post facto law as applied to defendant who had to stop attending his son’s school events.
Heckard v. State, No. 18A-CR-1376, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 11, 2019).
The evaluation of whether the continuous crime doctrine applies is distinct from the question of whether the continuous crime doctrine has been violated.
Crawfordsville Town & Country Home Center, Inc. v. Cordova, No. 18A-CT-314, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 24, 2019).
Equipment rental company had no duty to provide bilingual warnings for an aerial lift when warnings were given by the manufacturer and were clearly visible.
Harkins v. Westmeyer, No. 15A01-1703-CT-530, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 10, 2018).
T.R. 6(E)’s 3-day extension does not apply when the order creates a deadline from the date of the order.