• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

E. Tavitas

Demby v. State, 20A-CR-1012, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2021).

February 22, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

While aggravated battery is not an inherently included lesser offense of attempted murder, it may become a lesser-included offense depending on how it is charged. Pursuant to Wadle, if the factual circumstances and charging information render aggravated battery a lesser-included offense of attempted murder, the aggravated battery conviction would violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.

DeWees v. State, 20A-CR-1146, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Indiana Criminal Rule 26 warrants that, where a qualifying arrestee does not present a substantial risk of flight or danger to self or others, a trial court should release the arrestee without money bail or surety subject to such restrictions and conditions as determined by the court. Moreover, our Indiana Code provides that, in setting the amount of bail or deciding whether to grant conditional pre-trial release, trial courts must consider all facts relevant to the risk of a defendant’s failure to appear, including factors enumerated in Indiana Code Section 35-33-8-4(b).

B.R. v. State, 20A-JV-1203, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 28, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

To prove constructive possession, the State must demonstrate that the person has (1) the capability to maintain dominion and control over the item; and (2) the intent to maintain dominion and control over it.

State v. Ellis, No. 20A-CR-61, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2020).

August 10, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Community corrections participants “who have consented or been clearly informed that the conditions of their…community corrections program unambiguously authorize warrantless and suspicionless searches may thereafter be subject to such searches during the period of their . . . community corrections status.”

Combs v. State, No. 19A-CR-1991, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 9, 2020).

July 13, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

An inventory search must serve a legitimate administrative purpose and not be a pretext for an investigatory warrantless search.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs