“[W]e need not decide whether there might have been any error in the filing of the petition by the prosecuting attorney instead of the director of community corrections because we hold that any potential error was a procedural, not jurisdictional, error.”
E. Najam
Dotson v. Stryker Corp., No. 18A-PL-220, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 3, 2018).
Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it considered a deposition on summary judgment when it had not reviewed or signed at the time of its designation.
Weekly v. State, No. 20A03-1712-CR-2922, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2018).
A habitual vehicular substance offender (HVSO) finding does not constitute a separate crime nor result in a separate sentence, but is an enhancement to an underlying felony conviction.
Henderson v. Kleinman, No. 84A01-1710-CT-2566,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2018).
There is no statutory duty for a doctor to maintain adequate records; the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of doctor when “lack of documentation makes it impossible for the panel to decide whether the evidence supports or does not support a conclusion that the Defendant failed to comply with the appropriate standard of care in his treatment of the Plaintiff.”
S.B. v. Seymour Comm. Schools, No. 36A01-1710-PO-2252, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 26, 2018).
School corporations, through their officials, are permitted to act on behalf of their students to seek orders for protection against threatening individuals.