• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

E. Friedlander

K.O.A. Properties, LLC v. Matheison, No. 48A04-1207-SC-365,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 8, 2013).

March 14, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Small claims court had personal jurisdiction over a defendant even though it was not listed as a separate party defendant on the notice of claim and defendant was not separately served with the notice, because it was provided with service reasonably calculated to inform defendant that a small claims action had been instituted against it.

Erwin v. HSBC Mortgage Svcs., Inc., No. 32A01-1202-CT-80, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2013).

January 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Property mortgagor and property managers owed no duty to a girl who drowned in the pool of an abandoned house.

Sisson v. State, No. 09A02-1102-CR-199, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2012).

December 7, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness was not shown when State refiled recidivist allegations for the retrial after the court had declared a mistrial because the jury could not reach a verdict.

Godby v. State, No. 33A01-1203-CR-128, — N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 10, 2012).

October 12, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Because costs are not part of a criminal sentence, asserted errors in the costs imposed may not be raised in a motion to correct erroneous sentence.

R.W. v. State, No. 49A02-1112-JV-1187, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 25, 2012).

October 1, 2012 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Mother’s failure to sign on the waiver line of the juvenile waiver of rights form, when the form was the only evidence in the record of a purported waiver, required exclusion of the juvenile’s subsequent statement to the police. The juvenile court found that the alleged criminal mischief delinquent act had been proven but merged the mischief into the burglary act by entering a “not true” finding on the mischief; opinion vacates burglary delinquency due to the waiver form problem and remands to have a “true finding” entered on the criminal mischief count.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs