• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

E. Friedlander

McCallister v. McCallister, No. 49D12-1606-DR-19232, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 26, 2018).

July 2, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Although under federal law the court could not order husband to change the beneficiary on his Air Force Survivor Benefit Plan as required by the Marital Settlement Agreement, the trial court can determine the value of the Survivor Benefit Plan and reconsider the distribution of marital assets as an alternative remedy.

State v. McHenry, No. 35A04-1609-CR-2080, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 12, 2017).

April 17, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

The state may not elevate a charge to burglary while armed with a deadly weapon for an individual who obtains a handgun as loot during the course of a burglary.

Parkview Hospital v. Frost, No. 02A03-1507-PL-959, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 14, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: E. Friedlander, E. Najam

Evidence of discounts provided to patients who either have private health insurance or are covered by government healthcare reimbursement programs is relevant, admissible evidence regarding the determination of reasonable charges under the Indiana Hospital Lien Act.

First Bank of Whiting v. 524, LLC, No. 45A04-1410-MI-476, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 21, 2015).

July 23, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

To issue a tax deed pursuant to Ind. Code § 6-1.1-25-4.6(b) “there is implicit in the statute a sixth condition, which is that the petitioner is legally entitled to a tax deed after completing all of the requisite steps.”

Johnson v. State, No. 01A02-1501-CR-25, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 1, 2015).

July 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Criminal Trespass statute is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to common area immediately outside of trespass victim’s apartment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe

Archive

Copyright © 2023 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs