• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Thomas

Obergefell v. Hodges, No. 14–556, __ U.S. __ (June 28, 2015).

July 2, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: A. Kennedy, A. Scalia, C. Thomas, J. Roberts, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry.

McFadden v. United States, No. 14-378, ___ U.S. ___ (June 18, 2015).

June 26, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Thomas, J. Roberts, SCOTUS

Under federal Controlled Substances Act, conviction for dealing a chemical analogue of a controlled substance requires proof that defendant knew he was dealing a regulated substance.

Ohio v. Clark, No. 13-1352, ___ U.S. ___ (June 18, 2015).

June 19, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, C. Thomas, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Three-year-old’s report of abuse to his preschool teachers was not testimonial hearsay, and therefore did not violate Confrontation Clause when admitted at trial. Neither the child—nor the teachers, despite their mandatory reporting obligations—had the “primary purpose” to create substitute for trial testimony or assist in prosecuting defendant, but rather to respond to ongoing child-abuse emergency by identifying and ending the threat to the child.

Elonis v. United States, No. 13-983, 575 U.S. ___ (June 1, 2015).

June 5, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Thomas, J. Roberts, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Federal crime of transmitting threats in interstate or foreign commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), requires some heightened awareness that the communication will be perceived as threatening; mere negligence on that point is insufficient.

Rodriguez v. United States, No. 13-9972, __ U.S. __ (April 21, 2015).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, C. Thomas, R. Ginsburg, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Fourth Amendment does not allow police to extend duration of a traffic stop, even for a “de minimis” time period, for reasons unrelated the matter for which the stop was made.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs