The prior version of Sex Offender Special Condition 26, providing a ban on using the internet, is unreasonable since it does not reasonably relate to probationer’s rehabilitation and protecting the public.
C. Goff
Phipps v. State, No. 28S05-1707-CR-499, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 16, 2018).
Circumstantial evidence may be used to prove intent to violate a protective order and trial courts may weigh ongoing acts of criminal misconduct as an aggravating factor to enhance sentencing.
Ward v. Carter, No. 46S03-1709-PL-00569, __ N.E.3d __(Ind., Feb. 13, 2018).
Department of Correction’s change to Indiana’s lethal injection combination of drugs is not a substantive rule that must be promulgated according to the Administrative Rules and Procedures Act.