• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Goff

Griffin v. Menard, Inc., No. 21S-CT-119, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 19, 2021).

October 26, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, S. David, Supreme

When a box opened at the bottom and injured store customer, plaintiffs’ designated evidence did not create an issue of material fact to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ res ipsa loquitur claim also failed.

Rotert v. Stiles, No. 21S-TR-452, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 8, 2021).

October 12, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Statutory prohibition against restraints on marriage applies only to a devise to a spouse by will and not to other dispositions, like a trust.

Bradbury v. State, No. 21S-PC-441, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 1, 2021).

October 4, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, S. David, Supreme

Trial counsel was not ineffective for stipulating that defendant’s alleged accomplice, was convicted of murder because the stipulation did not relieve the State of the burden to prove defendant’s intent. Trial counsel pursued a reasonable all-or-nothing strategy when he chose not to seek a lesser-included instruction on reckless homicide.

Reece v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. No. 21S-CT-435, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 21, 2021).

September 27, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, L. Rush, Supreme

When visual obstructions are wholly confined to the land, a landowner owes no duty to the motoring public.

Renner v. Shepard-Bazant, No. 21S-CT-138, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 31, 2021).

September 7, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

In a bench trial, a party arguing for a mitigation-of-damages jury instruction “need only point to some evidence in the record that when viewed most favorably [to the party] would suffice for a reasonable juror to decide the issue in the party’s favor.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs